This penalty is explained in-game as the cost of sending a Cleaner to solve the problem, and the money being deducted from 47's account. Killing civilians generates an expense of $5,000. Said equipment do not remain with the player, however, with the need for them to be purchased again in following missions. In this system the player gets cash transferred in order to buy weapons and equipment necessary for the missions. There is no rating system in Hitman: Codename 47, only an expenses system. Players tend to use the expenses system as an informal rating system, only bringing to missions what is absolutely necessary to test their skill. The Agency deducts money from 47's payment due to the need of sending a "Cleaner" to cover for such civilian deaths. Hitman: Codename 47 does not have a rating system, with the player only being punished by killing civilians. Later games added easter egg ratings, such as The Russian Hare. This system had different ranks all the way to the coveted Silent Assassin rating. The rating system was first introduced in Hitman 2: Silent Assassin, measuring the player's performance in different categories such as shots fired, enemies killed and civilians harmed, making an equation of agression and stealth. Silent Assassin (commonly abbreviated to " SA") is the highest rating players can obtain at the end of a mission, after completing it with flawless stealth and with little to no aggression. If you enjoyed this story, check out this woman who was accused of having unreasonable vacation requirements."For achieving Silent Assassin rating, you have been awarded a bonus weapon" ― Hitman: Contracts, upon 47 completing a mission with Silent Assassin rating In The Know is now available on Apple News - follow us here! “Why do you need to go out and get coffee for another adult who is perfectly capable,” a person commented. “You’re 100 percent correct that if she wanted coffee that badly, she should have been willing to go get it herself,” another wrote. “Insisting other people run out and get something that isn’t an actual life or death item is completely ridiculous,” a user said. And if she really wanted it that bad, she would go and get it herself.” Reddit users thought the poster was in the right here. I told her it was entirely unnecessary and we could just go and get some for her in the morning at the store. When FFIL didn’t want to do it since he drove the last few hours of the trip, she wanted me and my fiancé to go, I refused. She wanted FFIL (future father-in-law) to do it as she had gotten a bad case of car sickness on the trip, which is true. That just wouldn’t work for her she insisted she needed someone to go out and get her coffee. “We all told her we could go as soon as everyone was up and get groceries as we had to anyways. “She just kept saying she needed to go to the store for her coffee to make in the morning,” the Reddit poster wrote. However, the future mother-in-law wouldn’t go to bed without her coffee first. Basically, everyone just wanted to get our stuff into the cabin, shower, and go to bed.” It was late, and we had been traveling all day (mind you, we only took one vehicle on this trip), and our time was two hours behind what it would normally be at home, so we were definitely feeling it. The next night, we got to our destination, a cabin in the Rockies.
But all we heard from FMIL was, ‘I’ve got to stop and have my coffee,’ so we did. “There was a coffee shop next to the hotel, so no problem there. “The first night, we drove until we couldn’t anymore and then got two hotel rooms,” the Reddit poster said. The issue was when the family finally arrived at the destination and just wanted to go to bed, the future mother-in-law demanded the Reddit poster go get her coffee. During the long trip, she regularly demanded coffee stops. Her future mother-in-law (FMIL) is coffee obsessed. She explained the situation on Reddit’s “ Am I the A******” forum. A woman became fed up with her future mother-in-law during a family road trip.